0
0

Hello,

I am wondering what is the difference in beetween use FSOUND_HW2D and FSOUND_2D appart of hardware support, I mean, is there any performance penalty or is FSOUND_HW2D more optimal.

I ask this becasue on my system (Athlon XP 2600 NForce 2 Ultra 400), seems to be a little gain (FPS), using FSOUND_2D over the HW version, but as we are targeting to casual gamer with low end machines (Ej: PII-350 are our min req), I appreciate if could tell me which one is better for all around cases.

PS: Worth mention that I am not using (no need for now) any 3D sounds.

Thanks in advance,
Oscar

  • You must to post comments
0
0

Thank you, so FSOUND_HW2D seems the way to go, as you suggest me it is better for low end machines.

Regards,
Oscar

  • You must to post comments
0
0

why not just give the user an option to select either, then they can use whichever works best for them

  • You must to post comments
0
0

Well, I am trying to keep options as clean and easy as possible, but maybe could be a good idea to let them choose if want HW or 2D.

Regards,
Oscar

  • You must to post comments
Showing 3 results
Your Answer

Please first to submit.